OPERATION ANACONDA PROFESSIONAL

Such understanding requires collaboration between multiple people and organizations (Department of the Army, 2019). Shared UnderstandingĪ shared understanding of the mission’s environment, problems, and goals is important for creating a cohesive fighting force.

Such an overestimation of the ally’s capabilities was another mistake that compromised the initial mission plan. However, the mission command of Operation Anaconda put arguably too much trust into the Afghan allies who withdrew under the fire instead of making an expected push (Kugler et al., 2009). It is essential for the subordinates to feel the commander’s trust in their competence (Department of the Army, 2019). Mutual trust is another crucial element of mission command, especially if the fighting force is international. troops was crucial for rectifying the errors made during the operation planning.

When the initial hammer and anvil battle plan of Operation Anaconda failed, the U.S-led coalition forces managed to show their competence and perform tactical adaptation under fire (Kugler, 2007).

OPERATION ANACONDA PROFESSIONAL

According to the Department of the Army (2019), the necessary professional competence is achieved through repetitive, realistic, and challenging training. The tactical and technical competence of commanders, subordinates, and teams is an essential prerequisite for effective mission command.

Operation anaconda